Turnover margin, final score finally align in Seahawks’ win over Steelers
On Sunday against Pittsburgh, a positive turnover differential and a Seahawks victory finally aligned for the first time this season.
Strong safety Kam Chancellor had the fourth and final interception for the Seahawks in Sunday's win. (AP)
(AP)
Pete Carroll had been at a loss all year to explain how the Seahawks could continue to lose games in which they won the turnover battle, a trend that defied general NFL logic and even more so his history as a coach dating back to USC.
Sunday against Pittsburgh, a positive turnover differential and a Seahawks victory aligned for the first time this season.
“Heck yeah. It finally did,” Carroll said after Seattle’s 39-30 win. “Finally. Isn’t that something?”
| Seahawks’ takeaway/turnover stats: 2015 | ||||||
| Team | TAKE | TURN | Diff. | Result | ||
| STL | 3 | 1 | +2 | L, 34-31 | ||
| GB | 1 | 2 | -1 | L, 27-17 | ||
| CHI | 0 | 0 | Even | W, 26-0 | ||
| DET | 1 | 3 | -2 | W, 13-10 | ||
| CIN | 2 | 1 | +1 | L, 27-24 | ||
| CAR | 2 | 0 | +2 | L, 27-23 | ||
| SF | 0 | 2 | -2 | W, 29-13 | ||
| DAL | 0 | 1 | -1 | W, 13-12 | ||
| ARI | 3 | 1 | +2 | L, 39-32 | ||
| SF | 0 | 0 | Even | W, 29-13 | ||
| PIT | 4 | 0 | +4 | W, 39-30 | ||
In any other season it wouldn’t be all that notable, especially for Carroll’s Seahawks. From 2010 to 2014, they were 33-6 in games in which they took the ball away from their opponent more times than they turned it over. But before Sunday, the Seahawks were 0-4 in such games this season. What’s more, three of their five wins had come despite a negative turnover differential while the Seahawks were even in their other two.
The chart shows the game-by-game breakdown.
The Seahawks intercepted four Pittsburgh passes on Sunday and didn’t turn the ball over on offense, finishing with a season-best plus-four margin and – finally – a victory to go with it.
“That’s more like it,” defensive end Cliff Avril said. “That feels like ’13 and ’14. … You expect to win if you get a lot of turnovers.”






Comments
0 Comments