Another PED ban doesn’t mean Seahawks are cheaters

May 22, 2013, 10:44 AM | Updated: 10:59 am

By Danny O’Neil

Editor’s note: This column was written on the wrong side of 2 a.m. by a host who is currently on a beach in Southeast Asia suffering from severe jet lag and under the influence of copious amounts of fruit juice, everything from mango to young coconut.

A rash.

That was one description of a condition currently afflicting the Seahawks. A spate was another term for the run of players on this team who have violated the league’s policy on performance-enhancing substances going back to 2011.

A glut was another term that someone used to evoke the feeling that this team that has made so much progress under coach Pete Carroll and general manager John Schneider is suffering from – well – an enhanced number of players getting popped by the NFL for taking a substance banned by the league because it’s deemed to aid performance.

Now, there are a lot of reasons to be troubled by the fact that defensive end Bruce Irvin is the fifth Seahawk on the active roster in three years to be suspended for a violation of that policy.

It means that players are failing to understand either what they are putting in their bodies or what they are allowed to put in their bodies. It also means they are not listening to their coaches and other support staff about what they are allowed to use.

What it doesn’t mean, though, is that the Seahawks are a team seeking to contend through chemistry as so many have implied. Anyone who thinks so is advised to consider this simple fact: You don’t have to beat a drug test to take a performance-enhancing substance in the NFL. At least not until the league and its players association reach an agreement on a test for human-growth hormone (HGH). Major League Baseball tests for it. So does the Olympics.

1ec72ec5-0125-4c69-b415-f63e071a5a52
Defensive end Bruce Irvin is the fifth Seahawk since 2011 to be suspended for violating the NFL’s policy on PEDs. (AP)

But not the NFL. Oh, the league says it’s a banned substance. Former NFL safety Rodney Harrison even got suspended for it while with the Patriots a few years back, but only because the league found evidence of a shipment to him.

A player can’t test positive for HGH in the NFL because the league doesn’t have an agreement in place to test for it, the most commonly cited excuse being that a blood test is required. Consider that next time someone says Seattle’s list of suspensions is some sort of indication that this team is taking an illicit chemical route to fulfilling last year’s mantra of “Bigger, Faster, Stronger.”

That’s not to say Seattle’s players are blameless in this. No, there’s plenty of blame to go around, especially considering the prevalence of one specific drug among the Seahawks’ suspensions.

That drug is Adderall, which is the only type of amphetamine that can be legally prescribed. It can be used for the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and the NFL permits a player to use it only if he applies for – and receives – a therapeutic-use exemption.

There have been five Seahawks on the active roster suspended for violating the league’s policy on performance-enhancing drugs. The number climbs to six if you include Vai Taua, a practice-squad running back who was previously suspended.

Three of those Seahawk suspensions have been linked – either directly or indirectly – to Adderall.

Guard John Moffitt was suspended in 2011, which he attributed to Adderall. Moffitt said last year that while he once had a prescription for the drug, it was old, and in any case, he was not aware it was banned because he wasn’t in training camp the day it was discussed. Cornerback Brandon Browner reportedly tested positive for amphetamines last year, serving a four-game suspension. Now comes defensive end Bruce Irvin, whose statement released by the team clearly implied that Adderall was the drug he used by stating it was “prohibited without a medical exemption.”

Plenty of people have implied the drug is some sort of smokescreen, which is understandable. One of the biggest flaws of the league’s drug-testing policy is that it does not specify what banned substance a player tested positive for. Adderall has come to be characterized as a convenient excuse for a player who wants to avoid the stigma generally associated with a positive test. After all, it is legal with a prescription and it is an amphetamine as opposed to an anabolic steroid. Adderall doesn’t really fit our preconceptions about a performance-enhancing drug. It wouldn’t seem to help you get stronger or faster.

That doesn’t mean it’s OK or it’s harmless. Plenty of drugs available by prescription are performance-enhancers, and who’s to say the properties of speed are any less a performance-enhancer than a drug that helps you recover faster from a workout, building more muscle?

The Seahawks do have a problem they need to address: Players continue to test positive for banned substances, showing that either they don’t know the guidelines from the league, aren’t diligent about following them or are outright disregarding them.

To imply that this run of positive drug tests implies the Seahawks have a roster full of players seeking a chemical advantage who simply point to Adderall when they’re caught is inherently misguided, though, because it fails to consider that the league isn’t even testing for one of the most obvious chemical advantages a player could seek out.

If you really were a player seeking some sort of pharmaceutical edge, why wait to get suspended so you can blame it on Adderall when you can take a substance that the league isn’t currently testing for?

Brock and Salk podcast

Brock and Salk

Mariners Julio Rodríguez...
Mike Salk

Salk: What separates playoff-bound Mariners from M’s teams that fell short

How did these Mariners get it right when their previous 20 teams all came short of the playoffs? Mike Salk breaks it down.
1 day ago
Seahawks Geno Smith...
Brandon Gustafson

Carroll: How Geno, Waldron had Seahawks’ offense ‘ripping’ vs Lions

After the Seahawks' 48-45 win over the Lions, Pete Carroll hit the Seattle Sports airwaves to discuss his offense, especially Geno Smith.
2 days ago
Seahawks Jamal Adams...
Brent Stecker

How missing Jamal Adams has thrown Seahawks’ defense for a loop

Brock Huard explains why something that K.J. Wright pointed out about the impact of Jamal Adams missing from the Seahawks' defense jumps out.
5 days ago
Mariners Mitch Haniger...
Brent Stecker

Mariners’ Mitch Haniger has a lot riding on the rest of the season

Mitch Haniger slumped in September, complicating what the Mariners should do with him set to be a free agent this offseason.
5 days ago
Mariners Jarred Kelenic...
Brandon Gustafson

Is Mariners’ Jarred Kelenic back for good? 3 MLB insiders weigh in

Jarred Kelenic has produced in his short time back with the Mariners from Triple-A. We look at what MLB insiders Mike Blowers, Jeff Passan and Jon Morosi have to say about him.
6 days ago
Seahawks Boye Mafe...
Brandon Gustafson

K.J. Wright: Why, how Seahawks should play Boye Mafe more

Seahawks legend K.J. Wright thinks Seattle needs to be playing rookie LB Boye Mafe more going forward, especially on early downs.
6 days ago
Another PED ban doesn’t mean Seahawks are cheaters