MIKE SALK

Salk: Could Seahawks find an elite QB in draft? They shouldn’t try

Dec 29, 2022, 12:03 AM

Seahawks Pete Carroll Geno Smith Drew Lock...

Seahawks coqch Pete Carroll with QBs Geno Smith and Drew Lock on Oct. 30, 2022. (Photo by Lindsey Wasson/Getty Images)

(Photo by Lindsey Wasson/Getty Images)

I can’t believe I am writing this column. I never thought I would believe what I’m going to say. But the Seahawks probably shouldn’t draft a quarterback in 2023. Even if they end up with the top pick in the draft.

Fann: Seahawks set to reap rewards of Broncos’ nightmare season

That’s not because I think Geno Smith is elite or even that he is definitively better than the top passers available in April. This comes down to a matter of practicality: it is simply easier to build a great roster with the picks they have than to identify and pick an elite quarterback.

First of all, what constitutes an elite quarterback? To define it most simply, it is a player that elevates everyone around them. And in today’s NFL, there are only a handful of signal callers who can make that claim. Patrick Mahomes is definitely on that list. I think Josh Allen is, too (although he hasn’t had the same success so far this year). I’d put Aaron Rodgers there because of what he’s done with unknown players around him. And Joe Burrow seems to be on his way. If you want one more, I suppose Justin Herbert is approaching this class. But that’s it.

And while all of those players will likely be in the playoffs, they don’t represent the only teams with a legit shot to go all the way. Philly, San Francisco, Dallas, and Minnesota have equally good chances and all are doing it with good quarterbacks who most wouldn’t qualify as elite.

So while having one of those elite quarterbacks is an enormous advantage, it isn’t the only way to build a contender. In fact, more playoff teams will have non-elite quarterbacks than elite ones, and a few of them might have better chances of winning than the elite guys do.

That leads us back to which is easier to accomplish. Based on the 27 teams without an elite quarterback, it sure seems like that one is awfully challenging. But the bigger issue is what happens when you attempt to find that elite guy and fail. Because for every Burrow, there is a Kyler Murray. For every Mahomes, there is a Zach Wilson. For every Rodgers, there is a Sam Darnold. And for every Allen, there is a Trey Lance or a Carson Wentz.

In fact, there are a lot more early draft picks who never pan out under center than there are ones who become elite. But that isn’t the whole problem. When you draft one of those guys in that spot, you have to commit to him. You have to build around him and his skills. You have to give him time to develop. You have to let him make some mistakes. You have to spend a lot of time and energy on making it work.

And if it doesn’t work, you have wasted all of that time and energy.

The Cardinals are the best example. They drafted a player in Murray who is good but not great. Then they doubled down by paying him. They cost themselves a chance to get better and then they made it worse by committing cap space to a guy who simply isn’t good enough to carry them. And by the time they get a chance to correct this, it will be at least five years since they selected him.

It’s great to have an elite quarterback. You can win with a good quarterback if you build your team right. But committing to a guy you think is elite and being wrong is a compounding problem that sinks your franchise for half a decade.

I understand why desperate teams reach for potential franchise quarterbacks. They don’t have a good one and they are hoping to shoot the moon. Sometimes it works, but the Seahawks aren’t in that situation. He may not be elite, but Geno Smith showed this year that he is good. He has exceeded every expectation despite a supporting cast that is well below league average.

So given the choice between reaching for a quarterback with that early pick and trying to make this roster better, I’d opt for the later. And I say this despite my firm belief that quarterback is the most important position in sports.

(Please burn this column after you read it!)

For more on this, hear Salk’s conversation with Darren McKee of The Fan 103.4 FM in Denver and the following segment where he dives more into the topic in the podcast below.

Cliff Avril: What Seahawks lack, what defense must do going forward

Brock and Salk podcast

Mike Salk

Seattle Seahawks Richard Sherman...

Mike Salk

Salk: Richard Sherman missed the mark about Seahawks’ changes

Mike Salk weights in on the reaction of former star Richard Sherman to the Seattle Seahawks making some changes to their building.

5 days ago

Seattle Seahawks draft Jared Verse...

Mike Salk

Salk: The perfect fit for Seahawks in draft isn’t who you think

O-line, defensive tackle and QB all make sense for the Seattle Seahawks to draft at No. 16. So why is Mike Salk all-in on edge Jared Verse?

11 days ago

Seattle Mariners J.P. Crawford...

Mike Salk

Salk on Mariners: What ‘it’s early’ does and doesn’t mean

When people say "it's early" during these slow Seattle Mariners starts, it doesn't mean they're accepting it, writes Mike Salk.

17 days ago

Seattle Mariners J.P. Crawford...

Mike Salk

Salk: Do Mariners need a different reaction to another slow start?

The Seattle Mariners are 3-4 after their opening homestand. Do they need to react to this slow start differently than others? Mike Salk takes a look.

24 days ago

Seattle Mariners Mitch Haniger...

Mike Salk

Salk: Scars remain as Mariners return, but hope isn’t far away

As the Seattle Mariners return for 2024, Seattle Sports' Mike Salk writes about seasons, scars, frustration, hope and baseball.

1 month ago

Seattle Seahawks QB Geno Smith Drew Lock...

Mike Salk

Salk: The NFL’s big QB problem that Seahawks must learn from

The NFL is not seeing success with quarterbacks taken in recent NFL Drafts. Why? Mike Salk breaks it down and what it means for the Seattle Seahawks.

1 month ago

Salk: Could Seahawks find an elite QB in draft? They shouldn’t try